Archive for May, 2008

This afternoon, Father got into work so late that I had all the work done (i.e., the Sunday bulletin) — he just looked it over, pronounced it a done deal (at least, it’s done unless we get any more news, so we won’t print till Friday), and then I had a chance to sit down with him and talk about this dissonance thing.

Good priest that he is, the first thing he said was that we shouldn’t be speculating about the relationship of the Trinity to One Another.  Good point.  Then he said that dissonances are actually very important, even in relationship with God, since they tell us what we need to work on, to bring ourselves into harmony with God.

Now where in Western Christendom would you find that point of view?!

In commenting on the last post, Mimi wrote, “I heart Fr. C!”  Me too, me too!  He is hands down the best priest I have ever known, and I feel so blessed that he’s in our parish!  Now…how to ensure that he stays put until he retires???

(Actually — believe it or not, the poor soul was on the receiving end of a couple of critical comments having to do with there being no dinner after Paschal services — a tradition of only ten years’ standing in this parish, and occasioned by the fact that the woman who’s done it for the past ten years took a break, and no one else stepped up to take her place — and he mentioned that he had been feeling a bit depressed about the negativity in the parish.  It gave me a good excuse to tell him that between Emily and me, he is becoming famous in the blogosphere as a Wunderkind.  He laughed an embarrassed little laugh and said he was over his depression by now, but he still looked pleased.  So I do worry about this parish wearing him out, and am trying to think of ways to keep his spirits up without being too obvious about it.)

Read Full Post »

Today’s sermon was, naturally, about St. Thomas, who has (unfairly, I think) gone down in history as Doubting Thomas. Father Costin started out by noting that “Thomas must have been a scientist” — not an unreasonable observation, since Thomas was at the very least an empiricist, someone who wanted to check out for himself the claim of the other Apostles. But from there, he segued into his real topic: What actually is reality? Is it the reality of the everyday, the bills, the house, the kids, work, school? Or is it the reality of Christ, of the kingdom to come, the unbelievable certainty of the Resurrection and the life of relationship with one another in Christ?

And it’s this life of relationship with one another in Christ that leads me to pose my question about dissonance and reality. I think I have mentioned that besides being a theoretical physicist (!!!), Father also trained as a classical musician — his parents, he says, wanted him to be a pianist, and listening to him play Bach is its own education. So he frames a lot of his own experience either in terms of science (as in his observation about Thomas) or in terms of music. A few weeks ago, in our weekly Bible study, we were talking about transgressions, and he described transgressions as “dissonance” — discussing a passage from John, he said that the Greek word for “transgression” was actually better translated as “dissonance.” I mentioned that to a priest I know who is from Greece (the priest to whom I have gone to confession for the past several years), and he blinked, then said, “That’s actually not a bad translation.” I guess he thought of it in other terms, probably having to do with his own training in engineering. (What is it with these scientific guys all going in for the priesthood?!?! My confessor was graduated first in his class from Columbia School of Engineering, no mean feat by any standards! There must be something about Orthodoxy that attracts logical minds, which is quite some recommendation, given the “touchy-feely” aspects of Western Christendom.)

So, back to my own question. The problem I’m having with “transgression” as “dissonance” is this: The relationship between the three Persons of the Trinity is assuredly one of perfect harmony, and is the model towards which we should all strive. When we sin, when we “miss the mark,” to translate the Greek word for sin (amartion), it’s because our relationship with God and with each other is out of whack — it’s “dissonant.” The thing is — in music, dissonance creates interest. When things are constantly in harmony, they’re beautiful, in the same way that plainchant is always beautiful, but the interest in music comes from those seventh chords, where you have a major chord (do-mi-sol) augmented by a minor seventh (a flat ti, to put it in terms of the do-re-mi scale that most folks are familiar with). That flat ti is very dissonant, and its resolution back into harmony is what makes music pleasing to the ear.

Similarly, dissonance in relationships is what makes them interesting. I mean — if we all liked the same thing, all the time, we’d all be in perfect harmony, but do I hear “BOR-ing” screaming through everybody’s brain? Of course I do. It’s our “dissonances” that make us interesting to one another. Similarly, when there’s real conflict between persons, it’s the resolution of that conflict — the resolution of that dissonance — that deepens the relationship.

But what’s niggling at my mind is Father’s sermon. Which reality is real? This world, or the world of the risen Christ? Is dissonance essential to interesting relationships, or is that because we live in this world, and we only think that dissonance is interesting? And, does dissonance deepen our relationship with God, or does it get in the way?

Any takers?

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts