Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for October, 2011

Question: “What % of who and what you are is determined by genetics vs your own choices? Is it 50/50 or more or less of one? Or should there be three numbers: your genetics, how you were raised, and your own choices (33/33/33 or 10/40/50)?”

The old Nature-vs.-Nurture debate. For what it’s worth, I think that the second half of the question raises an interesting point, namely: Without Nature, and without Nurture, how could you make your own unique choices to begin with?

I definitely do not think that there’s an equal input into all factors, based entirely on my own experience. In the European panoply of cultures, there can hardly be two more disparate than Russian and Irish. For one thing, the countries themselves occupy the two extreme ends of Europe. For another, Irish culture is based to a large extent on the proximity of the sea, and the plethora of rocks in the soil, whereas Russian culture is very rooted in the rich earth that makes farming such an important part of its history.

So why, all my life, have I been drawn to the Russian side of my family? I can’t truthfully say that there has been no input from the Russian side; after my mother was widowed young, she married a Polish man the next year, and although Russian and Polish cultures do have their differences, there are enough similarities that I’ve always felt more comfortable around Eastern Europeans generally. This does not explain why the only attraction of Irish culture for me is the music.

Then there’s the question of your own choices. Here I do come down heavily on the side of Nurture. Both my husband and I are classical-music lovers — another of those inborn traits, since neither of our families cares much for it, and we both love it — so that’s pretty much the only music you will hear in our house. At one point in my life, I even worked at a classical-music radio station, and one day, one of the announcers and I were chatting about kids and music. “Even if your kids grow up to prefer rock ‘n’ roll,” he said, “they will only be able to choose good rock ‘n’ roll. The trashy stuff will have no appeal for them.” I was a little surprised at the notion that anybody could actually prefer rock ‘n’ roll, but I had, of course, forgotten the Rebellion factor; kids do tend to make at least some choices opposite their parents’ preferences, purely as a matter of asserting their own selves. And sure enough, both of mine prefer rock ‘n’ roll. But it’s the stuff even I can listen to without cringing.

However, I also think that Nurture helps to shape your own inborn tendencies. I’m thinking specifically of my own lifelong conservatism. Where we grew up, every house in the neighborhood flew the American flag every day of the Vietnam War, and picked up the practice again during the Gulf War (and, presumably, during these current Iraq and Afghanistan Wars — I haven’t been home in too many years, since nobody’s left from the old neighborhood). Yet, the Vietnam era was one of extreme turbulence and rebellion. So why didn’t I break away? Why did so few of us from the neighborhood break away?

I don’t think it was because we would have been shunned by every house on the block. If enough of us had done so, we could have formed our own subculture very easily; after all, in those years, and in that town, kids outnumbered adults on an average of 4:1. Yet nearly all of us either served in the military, or had a family member who was serving, or we loved someone who was serving. Those were our choices, insofar as we actively chose them; certainly the neighborhood culture had a lot to do with our patriotism.

But I’ve noticed something interesting over the years: We all stayed pretty conservative. Most of us were first-generation Republicans, and that had a lot to do with the 1968 Democratic convention, which repudiated the Vietnam War, something that Just Wasn’t Done in our hometown. Democrat or Republican, we all went to church on Sundays in our town, and nearly all of us continue that practice in our old age, even if we let it slip during our fruitful years. I firmly believe that the choices we supposedly made all on our own were implanted in us at birth — patriotism, community, put-up-or-shut-up — and nurtured all throughout our school years and into young adulthood. I’m not sure we could have chosen any differently, no matter how hard we tried.

So, my own ratio? 50% Nature. 45% Nurture. And 5% my own choices. And from what I can see, that’s pretty much how it falls out for everyone else I know.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Topic Prompt: Do you think Shakespeare existed? Or are there just to many plays and sonnets credited to him to be the work of one person? The new film Anonymous questions his prolificity and his existence. If you think these claims against history are a waste of time, why do you think they are periodically raised by so many people?

You’re kidding, right?! I’m not gonna touch this one. For one thing, I have good friends whom I like on the other side of the pond, and I plan to keep them as friends. But for another — I mean, really, what’s this push to claim that the author of so much exquisite poetry never existed?! That some of the most enduring tales and poems ever penned, literature in the best sense that is still read, studied and loved 400 years later, was written — what? Anonymously? Don’t be ridiculous. Who’d shut up about knowing the author of “The quality of mercy is not strain’d”?!

As to why arguments “against history…are periodically raised by so many people,” look, there have always been iconoclasts. Some people lead such puny lives that they can’t stand the thought of true greatness, so they have to waste their time, and everyone else’s patience, making pointless and unproveable statements about the earth being flat, or questioning whether “unproveable” is spelled with or without an “e”. Or the works of Shakespeare were written by a committee.

People — get a life. I, in the meantime, have a life, in the form of a genuine snowstorm to deal with. Yes, in October. Not knowing when the power is going out, I also have a cake in the oven for breakfast tomorrow; we already know that church is out of the question, since the roads will not be treated in time to get us there. So, if we can’t get to church, we shall read our prayers at home, with or without electricity. And eat cake. And then read Shakespeare — by candlelight, if necessary — and feel sorry for all those pathetic nitwits who have to read something written by whomever they think Shakespeare was written by. As should be obvious from the quality of this post — it wasn’t me.

Read Full Post »

This post is in the nature of a letter my mother once received from a brother who stayed out of touch with the family for ten years.  He was in the Navy, so every once in so often my mother would get her sister (who worked for the American Legion) to track him down, and Mom would write to him — always with no response.  Finally, after ten years, she wrote, “This is the last letter I’m sending you,” and at long last, he responded:  “Nothing much is new since I last wrote.”

Back in May, I realized a couple of things:  (1) Nobody was responding to my posts, and (b) when they did, it seemed that I was annoying more people than I was edifying or gratifying or informing.  Besides, it isn’t as if I lead the most interesting life on the planet.  So I decided just to give up on the blogosphere.

Then I found a notification from National Blog Post Month (NaBloPoMo) to the effect that they were moving their blog site, and if I wanted to be able to access them I should sign up at the new site, and I decided — what the heck.  Even though “nothing much is new since I last wrote,” at least I’m writing again.

Now I have to figure out how to reactivate a lot of subscriptions to blogs that I let go during the Silence of the Muttonings.  Including NaBloPoMo.

Read Full Post »